Anova Culinary Sous Vide Precision Cooker 3.0 (WiFi)
Anova's newest model with 1100W and updated app -- but the 2.0 still has a better track record.
Updated
- 1100W heating -- 100W more than the Anova 2.0
- Updated Anova app with improved interface
- Stainless steel build, with the same listed plus or minus 0.1 degree C accuracy as the 2.0
Best For / Not For
Best for
- Existing Anova users upgrading from an older model
- Buyers who want the newest Anova model regardless of price
- Anyone who finds the 3.0 on sale at a lower price than the 2.0
Not for
- First-time sous vide buyers -- start with INKBIRD or Anova 2.0 instead
- Buyers focused on buyer feedback -- the 2.0 has a larger buyer base and stronger feedback
Key Details
When 3.0 Makes Sense Over 2.0
The only scenario where the 3.0 is clearly better than the 2.0 is if you need the extra 100W of heating power -- for large water baths or very cold starting temperatures. For a standard 8-quart pot of room temperature water, the 100W difference in heating time is under 5 minutes. Most buyers will not notice. The 3.0 app improvements are real but incremental -- the 2.0 app works fine.
If the 3.0 is significantly cheaper than the 2.0 on any given day (Amazon prices shift), that changes the calculus entirely. Check both prices before deciding.
Pros and Cons
Pros
- 1100W for faster heat-up than the 2.0
- Refreshed app with improved usability
- Anova's established brand and support network
- Stainless steel construction
- Same precision temperature control as all Anova models
Cons
- Weaker buyer feedback than the Anova 2.0 at time of review
- A smaller buyer base than the 2.0 -- less proven track record
Bottom Line
Consider the Anova 3.0 if you're an existing Anova user upgrading, or if the price is comparable to the 2.0 and you want the newer model. For most buyers, the INKBIRD ISV-100W or Anova 2.0 is the safer bet.
Check current price