SMITH Signal Cycling Helmet with MIPS Technology
MIPS-certified road protection from Smith -- the step up for serious cyclists who want the extra rotational impact defense.
Updated
- MIPS technology for rotational impact protection -- beyond CPSC certification
- Solid buyer feedback from an established cycling brand
- Smith -- established outdoor and cycling brand with sport heritage
Best For / Not For
Best for
- Road cyclists who ride regularly and want MIPS protection
- Cyclists who log 50+ miles per week where helmet quality matters more
- Buyers upgrading from a budget helmet to a properly certified road helmet
Not for
- Casual commuters who ride 2-3 miles per day -- the Schwinn covers that use case
- Mountain bikers who need MTB-specific geometry and extended rear coverage
Key Details
MIPS vs Non-MIPS -- Is the Upgrade Worth It?
MIPS adds a low-friction layer between the helmet shell and the liner that allows the helmet to rotate slightly upon impact. Real-world crashes typically involve angled impacts rather than perfectly vertical hits -- the angular forces from these impacts cause rotational brain movement that is the primary cause of concussions. MIPS reduces that rotational force by 10-40% depending on the impact angle. Studies from Virginia Tech, Annals of Biomedical Engineering, and others consistently show MIPS helmets outperform non-MIPS at reducing concussion risk. For cyclists who ride regularly at speed, the upgrade cost is justified.
Pros and Cons
Pros
- MIPS rotational impact protection
- Smith brand -- credible outdoor and cycling heritage
- Better ventilation and lighter weight than budget helmets
Cons
- More expensive than the Schwinn Thrasher
- No visor -- road cycling geometry without trail debris protection
- Smaller buyer base than the Schwinn
Bottom Line
Consider the Smith Signal MIPS if you ride regularly and want MIPS protection for road cycling. For casual commuters, the Schwinn Thrasher handles the use case at a lower price.
Check current price